<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
    xmlns:at="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/at"
    xmlns:icbm="http://postneo.com/icbm"
    xmlns:rvw="http://purl.org/NET/RVW/0.2/"
    xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss">
    <channel>
        <title>Liberal Provocateur</title>
        <link>http://liberalprovocateur.vox.com/library/posts/tags/parliament/page/1/</link>
        <description>A liberal techie throwing peanuts from the gallery</description>
        <language>en</language>
        <generator>Vox</generator>
        <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:45:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
        <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
        <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 
        <category domain="http://liberalprovocateur.vox.com/tags/">parliament</category>  
 
        <item>
            <title>Just the person to review MP expenses.. not</title>
            <link>http://liberalprovocateur.vox.com/library/post/just-the-person-to-review-mp-expenses-not.html?_c=feed-rss-full</link>   
            <author>nobody@vox.com(liberal provocateur)</author>
            <comments>http://liberalprovocateur.vox.com/library/post/just-the-person-to-review-mp-expenses-not.html?_c=feed-rss-full</comments>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://liberalprovocateur.vox.com/library/post/just-the-person-to-review-mp-expenses-not.html?_c=feed-rss-full</guid> 
            <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:45:44 -0800</pubDate>         
            
            <description>    &lt;p&gt;Well thanks Nick Clegg for not sticking with the status quo, and really rocking the boat with your bold leadership on reforming parliament.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think it&amp;#39;s great you&amp;#39;re supporting somebody who claimed tens of thousands of quid for his wifes shopping trips and pocket 20 grand more to cover accomodation costs that he didn&amp;#39;t have, and best of all - this chap is doing the review of MP expenses, gosh it doesn&amp;#39;t look like a corrupt old boys at all.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m sure that we as a nation can follow suit and you&amp;#39;d support us if we all decided to fiddle our tax returns and put things like shopping, family travel, lap dancers, etc through our books. I&amp;#39;m sure the Inland revenue wouldn&amp;#39;t quibble over a few tens of thousands of pounds for us all, and it certainly wouldn&amp;#39;t mean being prosecuted for fraud.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Speaking of bold moves - how is your big push for reform of drugs legislation? Oh. yeah. It doesn&amp;#39;t exist. Did you forget about it? Don&amp;#39;t be surprised that you will be forgotten too unless you stand out - because right now when people say our party doesn&amp;#39;t matter or make a difference, with the notable exception of Vince Cable and some excellent MPs that feels like the truth at the moment.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;    &lt;p style=&quot;clear:both;&quot;&gt; 
    &lt;a href=&quot;http://liberalprovocateur.vox.com/library/post/just-the-person-to-review-mp-expenses-not.html?_c=feed-rss-full#comments&quot;&gt;Read and post comments&lt;/a&gt;   |   
    &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vox.com/share/6a00e398984eaa000100f48cde99e80002?_c=feed-rss-full&quot;&gt;Send to a friend&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
 
            </description> 
            <category domain="http://liberalprovocateur.vox.com/tags/">fraud</category> 
            <category domain="http://liberalprovocateur.vox.com/tags/">liberal democrats</category> 
            <category domain="http://liberalprovocateur.vox.com/tags/">parliament</category> 
            <category domain="http://liberalprovocateur.vox.com/tags/">corruption</category>   
        </item> 
    </channel>
</rss>

