sweatshops alive and well
A guardian investigation has found UK shops using sweatshop factories in India and Bangladesh, thank goodness some of the media is capable of investigative reporting - even if they "provide balance" by including statements from companies denying everything. How hard is it to investigate it properly and verify things, or talk in more detail to NGOs who can verify things.
Anyway - it doesn't really come as any surprise - UK businesses don't care a jot about their suppliers working conditions, Nestle is even trying to replace the phrase 'corporate responsability' with 'shared values', which almost sounds identical to 'shareholder value'.
I noticed yesterday that I actually 'buy british' when it comes to clothing, entirely by accident, living in cornwall we tend to dress in 'surf wear', i.e. fat face and animal, as well as local surf brands like Gul, Flying Dodo, etc. Most of these clothes are bit more expensive, but they tend to be fairly well made, aesthetically pleasing, and coincidentally not made by pregnant mothers in appalling working conditions.
The other thing I noticed in the story was that, M&S used the same suppliers as Matalan, I remember a story told at one of my old jobs where somebody from the trade was working for Marks and they noticed that matalan or somebody had the same product at a much cheaper price, they asked where they copied it from - turns out they both bought the same bog standard stuff from the dirt cheap producer in the far east, a reminder that the rag trade is full of sleazy shysters who will sell low quality tat, but with a 'premium brand', at huge margins.
Comments
They provide money and training for people who would never have had any hope of either. They offer a boost to the local economy enabling local entrepreneurs the chance to offer services and goods.
Those who work in foreign owned sweatshops get better pay and conditions than local factories. They want to work there to improve their lives.
They are not the end of development, but they are an important stepping stone up the ladder to a better future, especially for their children.
If their grandchildren were still working in the same conditions then there would be something wrong, but experience in east asia shows that given liberal policies then within a generation the standards of living rise enormously.
That said, the anti-sweatshop brigade (often led by domestic unions seeking to preserve their member's jobs at the expense of the poor) provide a good service in keeping the standards reasonable and pointing out when things do get very bad (as they sometimes do).
Sweatshops move to wherever they can exploit labour, as soon as the progress you proclaim starts to look likely the sweatshops are gone - that comes with globalisation, leaving a trail of boom and bust in their wake, while the workers are left with a very specific manual skill that can't be re-used, the temporarily increased wages leave them even poorer than before as local prices will have increased.
Sweatshops are usually bad for the local economy - the specialist manual skills aren't useful in building a sustainable local economy (one hundred sewing machinists who can knock out cheap t-shirts sleeves, but not much else, many with work related injuries won't help a small town), they drain labour from long term local business, or from farming. Instead of having a product or skill valuable to the region or local area they will have nothing but injuries.
Exports and foreign investment *can* be good, but most sweatshops don't last long enough to leave any lasting benefit.